Thursday, October 1, 2009

Generating and Testing Hypothesis with Technology

Constructivist based on Lev Vygotsy believes that learning occurs when a meditating influence provides the “spark” to push the learner to the next level of knowledge. Constructionism defined by Seymor Paper believes that learning occurs as a result of building artifacts that can be evaluated by others. An artifact that allows for collaboration and problem solving for critical thinking. When understanding constructivist/constructionism based on the work of Piaget learning comes with active construction of knowledge. Fortunately for educators technology has made it possible for constructivist/constructionism learning to be made possible in the classroom (Laureate Inc., 2008).

There are numerous programs available that allow for constructivist/constructionist learning such as PowerPoint, wikis, blogs, webquests, and virtual tours. Two other programs mentioned in this weeks reading that can be incorporated to support constructivist/constructionism learning theories in the classroom are spreadsheet software and data collecting tools. Spreadsheet software can be used interactively by students for generating and testing hypothesis by creating graphs and charts for collected data or research. With this program students can make informed predictions, collect data, analyze the data, revise, and receive quick feedback on multiple scenarios (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007). The scenarios being used with this program allows for choice and generating their own thoughts and ideas with real life or made-up scenarios. When students are able to use real life scenarios they tend to become more involved and dig deeper into the research. An entire class can be involved in creating these spreadsheets which also enhances learning and engage students.

Furthermore, once all the research is complete and data is collected students can then use data collection tools to confirm, deny, or revise their last hypothesis. By using data collection tools students can see the bigger picture and recognize patterns (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007). Based on the facts researched they can compare the data to their predictions. Students can also compare and share their data online through collaborative project Web sites. Sharing and comparing data from other localities gives students enough information to generate and test hypothesis concerning the nation and other parts of the world (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007).

Because these applications allow for creating, generating, problem- solving, images, critical-thinking, and collaboration, both spreadsheet software and data collecting tools perfectly illustrate how technology correlates with constructivist/constructionism learning theories. These applications aforementioned help teachers combine the instructional strategies that affect student achievemen, perhaps gain higher tests scores, but more important, students will be enthusiastic while learning the material.


References:Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2008). Program five. Cognitive Learning Theory [Motion picture]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Baltimore: Author.Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom practice that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD

4 comments:

  1. Hello, I responded before you were complete I guess!

    Joy, I enjoyed reading your post! I agree that the virtual tours are great. I teach Kindergarten, so EVERYTHING needs to be visual. I am so excited to try one of those virtual field trips. With budget cuts we are asked to only take one trip a year! Thanks to the virtual ones my students are still able to experience other places. I also use graphic organizers all the time! I remember when I first transferred to Kindergarten from 2nd grade I assumed they wouldn't be as useful anymore, but I was wrong! All it took was some pictures and they have been just as effective if not more! Clip art has become my new best friend.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Joy,
    Your post really gave some great examples of constructionist learning. I work with first graders and I have really seen the benefit of using a hands on approach. When students work on something together it makes them active learners. When students are active they retain the information much more than having the teacher give the information. Although my first graders will not be using spreadsheets in my class, I have beeen able to use wikis and virtual tours. Students really love to use technology with their learning. Have you noticed this as well?

    Mandy

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joy,
    I think that everything you said is fantastic! You gave great examples of constructionist learning and you gave me some great ideas on how to integrate technology while doing so. PowerPoint is a great way to allow students the freedom and crativity needed to foster the ideas involved in constructionism. I use PowerPoint a lot in my 7th and 8th grade Health classes and the students create very good ideas!!

    Good post!
    Trisha Smart (Faulkner)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sarah, Amanda, and Trish, thank you for your responses. I am really excited to integrate technology into my classroom. It's pretty amazing all the sources we have now to make learning more fun. I just wish I had computers in my classroom to be able to use them more often to expose my students to all of the wonderful topics we are learning in this class because I can see how students would take learnng to the next level with the help of technology.

    ReplyDelete